Reading

Framing the Message of a Generation by Holland Cotter (NY Times 5/31/09)

Previous Story

JE NE SAIS QUOI at Sub-Basement Artist Studios &# [...]

Next Story

Bromo Tower celebrates first anniversary Thursday [...]

“Collection of Forty Plaster Surrogates,” 1982-84, by Allan McCollum, on view in the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s current exhibition “The Pictures Generation, 1974-1984.”

HOW does cultural history get written? Who chooses which portraits will hang in the hall of fame, which art will live on in museums, which books will end up on the classics shelf, which music will be standard fare in tomorrow’s concert halls?

We are encouraged to think that such judgments have lives of their own, are decided by a kind of natural selection. The most beautiful art will prevail, the most ambitious, the most morally uplifting, the most universal in emotional appeal. Everything else is by default of a lesser order. We shouldn’t fret if it disappears.

This view is, of course, wishful thinking. Moral and universal are concepts up for grabs; my notion of beautiful may leave you cold. Many of our masterpieces owe their origins to the distinctly immoral ambitions of power politics, their survival to prosaic strokes of luck, their present pre-eminence to institutional marketing, scholarly attention and popular sentiment. Even so, survival can be chancy. Fine things are tossed out and crummy things kept all the time.

In the case of art from the deep past we can usually only guess at how the selection process worked. With contemporary art we can see it in operation. We can see history being written — recorded, edited, enhanced, invented — right before our eyes. It can be a disturbing sight.

I was reminded of this after visiting two big history-writing and history-inventing exhibitions in New York this spring, “The Pictures Generation, 1974-1984” at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (through Aug. 2) and “The Generational: Younger Than Jesus” at the New Museum (through July 5).

Chu Yun, “This is Lacy,” 2006, a living sculpture installation with sleeping person at The New Museum Triennial.

Both are eagerly anticipated surveys, one of influential art from the near past, the other of art very emphatically of the here and now, and with an eye to the future. And neither show is modest in its aims. Both speak of art they are presenting in epochal terms, as defining not styles or trends but generations. This is a bold take on history, but a tricky one, gratifyingly dramatic, inevitably distorting.

To read the whole “Generation” review, click here.

To read Cotter’s “Young Artists, Caught in the Act” from April 9, click here.

Related Stories
Baltimore Joins in on a Day of Peaceful Protest Across the Nation

On Saturday, June 14, thousands showed up with to peacefully protest on "No Kings Day" in Patterson Park in opposition to the Trump administration.

The best weekly art openings, events, and calls for entry happening in Baltimore and surrounding areas.

This Week: Baltimore Clayworks' virtual artist talk with Yoshi Fujii, Qrcky artist talk at Quid Nunc Art Gallery, launch for Elizabeth Evitts Dickinson's book on Claire McCardell at MCHC, The Lewis Museum's Jubilee,  Eddie Kil opening reception at Make Studio, and more!

Materials Become Language in the 2025 Sondheim Finalist Exhibit at the Walters

The 2025 Sondheim Exhibit of finalists emphasizes the evocative power of materials in five mini solo exhibits.

The Burlesque Class of 2025 Invites You to Their Graduation

“We’re teaching from the inside out by really getting down deep into the issues that are keeping [students] from who they really want to be and translating that to the stage but also translating it to daily life."