Michael Anthony Farley: Right! In grad school you can make work people might hate, but you’re not going to go broke because of it!
Nia Hampton:I love bringing people in to see what I’m working on and to get opinions, and open studios always fall around my birthday, so I love using it to draw attention to myself. [laughs]
Michael Anthony Farley: Happy Birthday! I also would imagine that having the studios so relatively close to institutions and galleries is probably great for networking, right? I have noticed how much IMDA grads have been spotlighted in a lot of recent survey shows like Young Blood at Maryland Art Place, which is technically walking distance from you guys.
Nia Hampton: Yeah, I think it definitely can be because each semester is different depending on who’s working in the space and who is promoting it. I do think under [Graduate Program Director] Sarah Sharp’s leadership the program will probably be poised to be a lot more public. I have worked hard to be a more public-facing artist.
Michael Anthony Farley: My friend Lexie Mountain and I made the decision to apply to UMBC together way back in the day, and we were just talking about this earlier this year when we did a little “Ten Year Reunion” chat for BmoreArt—that IMDA feels like a more open-ended “choose-your-own-adventure” MFA compared to a lot of other programs. You have to be self motivated, right? You need to come in hungry. I mean that in a good way!
Not to throw shade at any specific schools, but sometimes when I’m at an art fair I can clock which MFA program a painter went to from across the room based on the fact that so many crank out cookie-cutter artists. But at IMDA there’s no dominant aesthetic. It’s really diverse, and you’re just kinda handed a tool chest with the ability to independently pick how you want to work…
Bao Nguyen: …and then get feedback about that work.
Nia Hampton: Yeah, the critiques are really a unique experience… I’m like, “I wish this was an experience available outside of MFA programs!”
Sometimes it’s good and bad, people comment that I bring people into my studio all the time, because on one hand it’s great that you have a dedicated group of people who watch you grow and your faculty and your cohort members.
But that can also be limiting—if those are the only people that are seeing your work consistently and talking to you about it, you get to a point where you understand that feedback comes from the viewpoint of what the other person does… Like we all have our thing that we do and every time we’re looking at someone’s work it’s like oh maybe you should do this and it’s like you’re saying that because that’s what you would do!
Which is fine, but I think over time your practices do start to blend. That can be cool. But I constantly want new people to come and tell me things! Especially since I didn’t have a background as a studio artist. I came here instead of film school because I wanted the feedback from a diversity of opinions… sculptors, writers, painters.
I am more and more interested in researchers! I’m starting to realize you can use research grants in the humanities to pay for your practice. I want to talk to everybody! It just opens up the idea of what a “career as an artist” can look like.
Bao Nguyen: Here I also want to add that I think of this program more like a support system for me, rather than an academic structure that’s going to dominate my practice. I’m getting a living stipend, health insurance… it’s a support structure and resources for the parts of my practice that maybe aren’t even contained within the program, if that makes sense?
Nia Hampton: Yeah! You kind of get to experience living as a full-time artist without the stakes being, you know, “if they hate my work will I still have health care?” You get to kind of live in this little bubble for three years and get to use it bravely!